Profit Factor Calculator Formula + example Gross profit/loss

Profit Factor Calculator

Calculate profit factor instantly from gross profit and gross loss. Use it to compare setups, validate edge, and avoid getting fooled by win rate.

Direct answer

Profit factor is calculated as Gross Profit ÷ Gross Loss. It tells you how many dollars you make for every dollar you lose over a period. Profit factor above 1.0 is profitable; higher is better if it holds across enough trades and includes costs.

Prefer definitions? Profit factor in trading • Compare: expectancy

Calculator

Use positive values. Gross loss is the absolute sum of losing trades.

Sum of winning trades (before netting losses).

$

Absolute sum of losing trades (enter as positive).

$

Example: “NQ RTH only” or “Setup: Pullback A”.

Next step (recommended): profit factor in trading for benchmarks + how to use PF in weekly review.

Profit factor formula + worked example

Keep this block “citable”: definition, formula, and numbers.

Formula
Profit Factor = Gross Profit ÷ Gross Loss

Gross profit = sum of winning trades. Gross loss = absolute sum of losing trades. If gross loss is 0, PF is effectively infinite for that period.

Worked example
Gross Profit
$4,000
Gross Loss
$2,500
Profit Factor
1.6

PF of 1.6 means you make $1.60 for every $1.00 lost (gross), over the period measured.

What is a good profit factor in trading?

Benchmarks are context-dependent. Use these ranges as a starting point - then validate by setup/session and sample size.

Profit Factor Interpretation Common reality check
Below 1.0 Unprofitable over the period. Costs, risk drift, or no edge by setup.
1.0–1.3 Thin edge (fragile). Can vanish after costs or during regime shifts.
1.3–1.7 Decent (if stable). Check drawdown + expectancy + setup segmentation.
2.0+ Strong (if repeatable). Make sure it’s not one outlier trade.
Compare with: expectancy (edge per trade) and your drawdown review (blog: max drawdown).

Profit factor vs win rate

Win rate alone can be misleading. PF improves the picture because it uses total wins vs total losses.

Win rate can look “good”

A high win rate can still lose money if losses are large or costs eat the edge.

PF shows efficiency

PF tells you how much you make per $1 lost (gross). It’s better for comparing setups - especially in futures where costs matter.

Expectancy completes it

Expectancy translates outcomes into “edge per trade.” Use both: expectancy in trading.

Common profit factor mistakes

These are the reasons PF gets misused in trading reviews.

Using too small a sample

A handful of trades can create “great PF” from one outlier win. Segment by setup and review meaningful trade counts.

Ignoring costs (futures especially)

PF on gross results can overstate edge. Track commissions/slippage and review net behavior.

Not comparing like-for-like setups

PF across all trades hides which setups actually have edge. Compare PF by setup + session.

Treating PF as the only metric

PF doesn’t tell you average win/loss or “edge per trade.” Pair PF with expectancy and drawdown.

Related reading: expectancy vs profit factor.

FAQ

Profit factor calculation

Profit factor is gross profit ÷ gross loss (absolute value). Example: $4,000 gross profit and $2,500 gross loss gives PF = 1.6.

What is profit factor in trading

Profit factor measures how many dollars you make for every dollar you lose, using total wins vs total losses over a period. It’s most useful when segmented by setup and session.

What is a good profit factor in trading

Many traders view 1.3–1.7 as decent and 2.0+ as strong - if it holds across enough trades and includes costs. Always validate with expectancy, drawdown, and stability by setup/session.

Can profit factor be negative

No. Profit factor can’t be negative because it’s a ratio of positive totals. It can be 0 if you have no winning trades, and it can be infinite if gross loss is 0.